Re: New trigger option of pg_standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10903260032v767da1fdg6cf7cea86c64cc45@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com>)
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use
> the existing trigger option character (-t)?

Yes, that's my point.

I understand it seems weird to switch the options but I'm pretty sure
a lot of persons currently using -t would be surprised by the current
behaviour. Moreover playing all the remaining WALs before starting up
should be the most natural option when people are looking in the help.

That said, it would be nice to hear from people really using
pg_standby to know if they understand how it works now and if it's
what they intended when they set it up.

-- 
Guillaume


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: Function C and INOUT parameters)
Next
From: higepon
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump Add dumping of comments on index columns