-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Moral of the Story:
>
> A smaller file to download (via better compression) only decreases the
> time it takes to download.
I think the real argument in favor of providing a bz2 alternative to gz
*is* the time to download. Loading a Postgres tarball over a dialup line
is much faster with bz2 rather than gz. This has been covered on the list
before: I recall that most everyone agreed it was a good idea, but nobody
on the website appeared ready to follow through with it and actually
set up the bz2 files.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303201036
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+eeCfvJuQZxSWSsgRAvy+AJ9wWoOgXezn3p01/D4jed2sNqT6DQCfXkz5
0uvv7khQJ4LAXMYydMnpWdM=
=Lg8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
