Re: Slow updates, poor IO - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dan Langille
Subject Re: Slow updates, poor IO
Date
Msg-id 1DFA2F1D-56D0-46B1-B9E1-27E994822FF4@langille.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow updates, poor IO  (John Huttley <John@mib-infotech.co.nz>)
Responses Re: Slow updates, poor IO  (John Huttley <John@mib-infotech.co.nz>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sep 28, 2008, at 10:01 PM, John Huttley wrote:

>
>
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, John Huttley wrote:
>>
>>> checkpoint _segments=16 is fine, going to 64 made no improvement.
>>
>> You might find that it does *after* increasing shared_buffers.  If
>> the buffer cache is really small, the checkpoints can't have very
>> much work to do, so their impact on performance is smaller.  Once
>> you've got a couple of hundred MB on there, the per-checkpoint
>> overhead can be considerable.
>>
> Ahh bugger, I've just trashed my test setup.

Pardon?  How did you do that?

--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: John Huttley
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow updates, poor IO
Next
From: John Huttley
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow updates, poor IO