Re: [GENERAL] Limitation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Limitation
Date
Msg-id 199906251256.IAA19598@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Limitation  ("John Huttley" <john@mwk.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general
> So lets have a look at everything again. Consider it a users wish list for
> 7.0
>
> 1. The 7 field index limit. Doubtless someone made a decision back in the
> dark ages that no-one would ever need
> more than that.
>
> 2. Ruleplan overflows. maybe fixing this is just changing a #define to
> allocate more space.

This is on 6.6 item list.

>
> 3. Parametised Stored Procedures that return record sets. This is a
> significant item. Commercial db's can do it.
> Porting modern applications to PG will require it.
>
> 4. Unlimited tuple size. I see that this is already on the list.

So is this one.



--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alex Shnitman
Date:
Subject: *Old* PostgreSQL version
Next
From: Alex Shnitman
Date:
Subject: *Old* PostgreSQL version