Re: [GENERAL] Scalability to very large databases under Linux - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martin Weinberg
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Scalability to very large databases under Linux
Date
Msg-id 199906152301.TAA08113@osprey.phast.umass.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Scalability to very large databases under Linux  (M Simms <grim@argh.demon.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
M Simms wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:58:28 BST
>> Dear Folks,
>>
>> We have been running 6.4.2 under Linux on a dual Xeon box
>> with mostly good success.  Our current dataset is 20 million records
>> of mostly numerical data (56 fields of floats [70%], ints [20%] and
>> a few text fields [10%]).  The performance is acceptable, the only
>> problem so far has been the difficultly in floating type promotion
>> "confusing" the optimizer.
>>
>> Our database is about to expans to 150 million records.  Given
>> sufficient diskspace (e.g. a larger RAID array) will postgres
>> perform on this volume?  Are there any gotchas?  General comments
>> from people with experience with databases of this volume under
>> postgres?
>
>The only problem I could see immediately is that the Linux ext2 filesystem has
>a 2GB limit on any one file. Postgresql has functionality to get round that (a
>s
>was discussed a few months ago on the list) but it apparently causes problems
>in some instances. I suggest you look through the archives for this one.
>
>

There is one I know about, which was a fencepost-type bug with
the addressing in Linux.  There was a patch posted in "hackers"
which I had to apply to get this to work in 6.4.2.  Our current
database already exceeds the 2Gb limit.

--Martin



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Dan Wilson"
Date:
Subject: Fw: Can't even specify template
Next
From: listiana sulistiyanto
Date:
Subject: subscribe mailing list