> The organization of the classes confused me. I remember thinking it
> strange certain classes inherited from others. Its been a few weeks since
> I looked at LIBPQ++. I was content to build around LIBPQ since it was
> mostly documented. I'm weak on database theory, so the LIBPQ++ design
> might make sense, and my C++ classes might be rather shallow. As I
> mentioned before, my attempts were mostly to bullet-proof LIBPQ.
>
I have always felt the libpq++ really did not take full advantage of
C++, but did not have the time to really think about how it should be
improved. Good luck.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
