>> > There are some duplicate oids in pg_proc of May30 snapshot.
>> > I know octet_length's are from my patch but for others I don't know.
>> > Comments?
>>
>> Those must be mine (char, char_bpchar, bpchar, bpchar_char). I am sure
>> that I ran ./unused_oids to assign them, but obviously messed it up.
>> Will reassign soon. Darn :(
>
>Oh, I see what happened. I developed on a revlocked tree from 980513 and
>then patched the current tree and ran the regression tests. Patches
>applied cleanly and the regression tests passed, so I submitted the
>patches.
>
>In the meantime your patches used the same OIDs, and the regression test
>is apparently not sensitive to the overlap.
>
>Just to avoid confusion: only one of us should try to fix the problem :)
>Shall I, or are you already working on it?
Not yet. Could you solve the duplication? Thanks in advance,
--
Tatuso Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp
