Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and rules (not instead)) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett McCormick
Subject Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and rules (not instead))
Date
Msg-id 199802231041.CAA20766@abraxas.scene.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and rules (not instead))  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
Please don't CC the root users (or the mailing list twice) on this.
I've removed them from the headers.  Sorry, I don't know how the
addresses got in there.

> Brett wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 22 February 1998, at 18:26:45, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> >
> > Is develemopment being done for PL/pgSQL?  What are peoples ideas for
> > this?  I've never used a commercial db before, and the free ones don't
> > usualle have a stored PL language.  What sort of things are you guys
> > anticipating?  In the writing of PL/perl i've been tempted to give
> > lots of access to the backend internals from perl (why not, it should
> > have all the facilities C function programmers have!)  What do you think?
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mattias Kregert
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and ru les (not instead))