Re: Query plan for "heavy" SELECT with "lite" sub-SELECTs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Query plan for "heavy" SELECT with "lite" sub-SELECTs
Date
Msg-id 1994.1162565453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query plan for "heavy" SELECT with "lite" sub-SELECTs  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net> writes:
> ... Rewriting it to something like this made the last iteration about as
> fast as the first:

> SELECT docid, (SELECT work to be done for each document)
> FROM documents
> WHERE docid IN (SELECT docid FROM documents
>     ORDER BY docid
>     LIMIT 1000
>     OFFSET ?
> )

The reason for this, of course, is that the LIMIT/OFFSET filter is the
last step in a query plan --- it comes *after* computation of the SELECT
output list.  (So does ORDER BY, if an explicit sort step is needed.)
So if you have an expensive-to-compute output list, a trick like Arjen's
will help.  I don't think you can use an "IN" though, at least not if
you want to preserve the sort ordering in the final result.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Context switch storm
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: profiling PL/pgSQL?