Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets
Date
Msg-id 19854.1156807257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, got it.  I just don't see the value to doing \g and not ;. I think
> the \gc case was a hack when he didn't have \set.  Now that we have
> \set, we should be consistent.

I'm willing to accept this if we can make sure we aren't adding any
overhead --- see my proposal elsewhere in the thread for fixing that.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets
Next
From: Chris Mair
Date:
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in