Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > OK, got it. I just don't see the value to doing \g and not ;. I think
> > the \gc case was a hack when he didn't have \set. Now that we have
> > \set, we should be consistent.
>
> I'm willing to accept this if we can make sure we aren't adding any
> overhead --- see my proposal elsewhere in the thread for fixing that.
Right, if \g has overhead, I don't want people to start using ; because
it is faster. That is the kind of behavior that makes us look sloppy.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +