Re: UPDATE using query; per-row function calling problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: UPDATE using query; per-row function calling problem
Date
Msg-id 19724.1314984026@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPDATE using query; per-row function calling problem  (pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?pasman_pasma=F1ski?= <pasman.p@gmail.com> writes:
> That's interpretation of subselect is ok, when it contains only stable
> functions.

> Maybe add a warning when subselect contains volatile function.

We're not likely to do that, because this sort of notation is actually
fairly commonly used to hide the volatility of non-stable functions.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Vorobiev
Date:
Subject: JDBC XA resource bug?
Next
From: "Bob Pawley"
Date:
Subject: Re: Variable column name