Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id 19628.1485977554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, including the GID in the WAL for each COMMIT/ABORT PREPARED
> doesn't seem inordinately expensive to me.

I'm confused ... isn't it there already?  If not, how do we handle
reconstructing 2PC state from WAL at all?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration