Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The problem is that people think that "ISO" means ISO 8601, whereas it
> actually means ISO 9075. I can see how that's an easy mistake to make,
> though.
... especially since we keep referring to 8601 in our own docs.
Does this mean we should do a global s/8601/9075/ in the docs?
regards, tom lane
