On lör, 2012-05-19 at 11:52 -0400, Daniel Farina wrote:
> The documentation is misleading to the point of our support for ISO
> 8601-strict parsing.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-02/msg01237.php
>
> A very fine point, but I discovered it not out of curiosity, but a
> fairly angry user on Twitter.
>
> We can define the problem away since the space-inclusive format is so
> common...so much so, that it is codified in RFC 3339
> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt). The only problem, then, is the
> DATESTYLE "ISO" labeling: changing that would be really painful, so
> perhaps another solution is to parse the "T" demanded by 8601,
> presuming no other details come to light.
The problem is that people think that "ISO" means ISO 8601, whereas it
actually means ISO 9075. I can see how that's an easy mistake to make,
though.
