Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id 1934987.1619365195@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
List pgsql-hackers
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 01:43:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I haven't looked, but did we put anything into pg_stat_statements
>> to make it easy to tell if you've messed up this setting?

> You mean apart from from having pg_stat_statements' view/SRFs returning
> nothing?

> I think it's a reasonable use case to sometime disable query_id calculation,
> eg. if you know that it will only lead to useless bloat in the entry and that
> you won't need the info, so spamming warnings if there are no queryid could
> cause some pain.

I agree repeated warnings would be bad news.  I was wondering if we could
arrange a single warning at the time pg_stat_statements is preloaded into
the postmaster.  In this way, if you tried to use a configuration file
that used to work, you'd hopefully get some notice about why it no longer
does what you want.  Also, if you are preloading pg_stat_statements, it
seems reasonable to assume that you'd like the global value of the flag
to be "on", even if there are use-cases for transiently disabling it.

I think the way to detect "being loaded into the postmaster" is
    if (IsPostmasterEnvironment && !IsUnderPostmaster)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements