Re: Subtle bug in autoconf flex version test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Subtle bug in autoconf flex version test
Date
Msg-id 19280.1462197888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Subtle bug in autoconf flex version test  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 02 May 2016, at 15:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, is that a popular flex version?  I wonder whether we will get
>> complaints if we start warning about it.

> Sorry, I missed half the sentence there.  What I meant was that I can trigger
> the warning synthetically by changing the version number just to test the
> warning; before any version is happily accepted.

Ah, I see.  I was wondering where you found a flex reporting such a
number; I was guessing it was an unreleased devel version ...

Will commit the fix in a bit.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactor pg_dump as a library?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Add jsonb_compact(...) for whitespace-free jsonb to text