Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in
Date
Msg-id 19109.1138916461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> As a matter of curiosity, why does ecpg handle dollar quoting like that?
> psql, for example, happily just passes a dollar quoted string through to
> the backend, without any need to convert it to a conventionally quoted
> string.

Doesn't ecpg have to convert string literals into C string constants?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in