Re: bit string functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bit string functions
Date
Msg-id 19094.1184614987@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bit string functions  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: bit string functions  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
>> I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry. 

> I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of
> operators and functions in core.

Considering that BIT and BIT VARYING have been removed entirely from
SQL:2003, it seems unlikely to me that we should expend our limited
resources in that particular direction.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: bit string functions
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: SSPI authentication