Re: Issues with patitionning and triggers - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Samuel Gilbert
Subject Re: Issues with patitionning and triggers
Date
Msg-id 18823874.HY42oWSZY1@yamium
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issues with patitionning and triggers  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: Issues with patitionning and triggers  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2014-02-18 14:25:59 Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 02/18/2014 02:10 PM, Samuel Gilbert wrote:
> > I have data warehousing DB 2 fairly big tables : one contains about 200
> > million rows and the other one contains about 4 billion rows.  Some
> > queries
> > are now taking way too long to run (> 13 hours).  I need to get these
> > queries to run in an hour or so.  The slowdown was gradual, but I
> > eventually hit a wall, when the planner stopped using indexes.
> >
> >
> > The other issue I'm encountering is that I also have very simple BEFORE
> > UPDATE and BEFORE INSERT triggers that set the modification date on every
> > single row
> >
> >
> > CREATE FUNCTION set_modificationDate() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
> > BEGIN
> >
> >     NEW.modificationDate := now();
> >     RETURN NEW;
> >
> > END;
> > $$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
> >
> > The modification date must be updated if any row is modified in any way.
> > I
> > first tried to define the triggers on the parent table.  This worked, but
> > I
> > realized that if a queries targets explicitly a child table, it could
> > modify a row without the date being updated.  I therefore dropped the
> > triggers on the parent table and defined them for every child.  To my
> > great surprise, the insert below failed with a message saying that NULLs
> > are not allowed in the modificationdate column.
> >
> > INSERT INTO observation
> > (dataset, station, method, startdate, duration, value)
> > VALUES (9, 2, 128, '2014-01-01 00:00:00', '24 hours', 42);
> >
> > Why isn't the BEFORE INSERT trigger on the child table being executed?
>
> Constraints are checked before triggers are run.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Samuel Gilbert

I don't think that is the case since I currently have the BEFORE INSERT
trigger working on the non-partitioned version of the table.

The modificationdate field has a NOT NULL constraint.  Even if I explicitly
provide a NULL for the modificationdate column, a date gets written in the
table.  This leads me to believe that the BEFORE INSERT trigger is really
executed before the constraint is checked.

What I don't understand is why the trigger doesn't appear to be executed when
it's defined on a child table.  I'll add a RAISE NOTICE to the trigger
function to makes sure it's not getting called.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Day, David"
Date:
Subject: Re: syslog facilites and postgres ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with patitionning and triggers