Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Date
Msg-id 18712.1030736309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> On second thought, *all* functions failing is what you expected, right
>> Tom?

Yeah.  I coulda sworn I tested pg_settings yesterday after making those
other changes, but I must not have; it's sure failing for me today.

> Here is a patch with the above mentioned fix. It also has an addition to
> rangefuncs.sql and rangefuncs.out to ensure a C language table function
> gets tested.

Good idea.  Will apply.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: indisclustered and clusterdb
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about