Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Date
Msg-id 3D6FD316.7000104@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about memory management with SRFs)  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>>Here is a patch with the above mentioned fix. It also has an addition to
>>rangefuncs.sql and rangefuncs.out to ensure a C language table function
>>gets tested.
>
> Good idea.  Will apply.

BTW, Neil, do you have a sample plpgsql table function that can be
included in the rangefuncs regression test?

Thanks,

Joe


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about