Re: another plperl bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: another plperl bug
Date
Msg-id 18684.1101159032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another plperl bug  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> Here's another test case: a function that doesn't return what it's
> supposed to return.

I was wondering about that --- the code paths that expect an array
seemed to be testing the SV type more carefully than those expecting
a hash did.  Sigh.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gavin M. Roy"
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta5 now Available
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: plpgsql - access records with rec.(expr)