Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:08:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's an operator name.
> Ah, didn't notice. But that means that ecpg should not accept "?" as
> placeholder either as this is prone to give errors depending on the
> usage right?
I'd vote that way if you haven't accepted it in the past. Otherwise
you'll need some kind of compromise for backward compatibility ...
regards, tom lane
