Re: bytea vs. pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 18163.1249341511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>)
Responses Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
One other stylistic gripe: I don't much like inserting a GUC variable
definition into builtins.h --- that file has traditionally only
contained function extern declarations.  The best alternative I can
think of is to move the bytea-related stuff into a new include file
include/utils/bytea.h.  Has anyone got an objection or a better idea?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications