Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Date
Msg-id 18150.1492358458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:41:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is 100% wrong.  It's failing to recurse into the subexpressions of
>> the SubPlan, which could very easily include parallel-unsafe function
>> calls.  Example:

> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know.

FYI, I have this on my to-look-at list, and expect to fix it before Robert
returns from vacation.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?