Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id 18052.984715284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, but the point of adding all those configuration options was to allow
> us to figure out which was faster.  If you can do the code so we no
> longer need to know the answer of which is best, why bother adding the
> config options.

How in the world did you arrive at that idea?  I don't see anyone around
here but you claiming that we don't need any experimentation ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC