Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:02 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > >On 6/17/19 8:29 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > >> From perspective of cryptographic, I think the fine grained TDE would
> > >> be better solution. Therefore if we eventually want the fine grained
> > >> TDE I wonder if it might be better to develop the table/tablespace TDE
> > >> first while keeping it simple as much as possible in v1, and then we
> > >> can provide the functionality to encrypt other data in database
> > >> cluster to satisfy the encrypting-everything requirement. I guess that
> > >> it's easier to incrementally add encryption target objects rather than
> > >> making it fine grained while not changing encryption target objects.
> > >>
> > >> FWIW I'm writing a draft patch of per tablespace TDE and will submit
> > >> it in this month. We can more discuss the complexity of the proposed
> > >> TDE using it.
> > >
> > >+1
> > >
> > >Looking forward to it.
> > >
> >
> > Yep. In particular, I'm interested in those aspects:
> >
>
> Attached the draft version patch sets of per tablespace transparent
> data at rest encryption.
I was worried that there's competition between us but now that I've checked
your patch set I see that you already use some parts of
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2104/
although not the latest version. I'm supposed to work on the encryption now,
so thinking what to do next. I think we should coordinate the effort, possibly
off-list. The earlier we have a single patch set the more efficient the work
should be.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
