Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved?
Date
Msg-id 17728.1261002579@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Looking at it more closely, this is likely to be fallout from the
> plpgsql lexer/parser changes; it probably worked before only because
> plpgsql was doing its own thing rather than using the main lexer.

Hmm .. yeah, words that are reserved according to the main grammar
could have worked as plpgsql variable names before, since they always
got replaced with "$n" before the main grammar saw them.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Range types