Re: currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? ) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )
Date
Msg-id 1739.980009513@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )  ("rob" <rob@cabrion.com>)
List pgsql-general
"rob" <rob@cabrion.com> writes:
> Is there a correct way to "initialize" currval without incrementing the
> sequence?

No, but for the purpose that was being discussed here, I don't see why
you'd need to.  Maybe you should explain the application logic that
seems to require such a thing.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "rob"
Date:
Subject: currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )
Next
From: "Gregory Wood"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: couple of general questions