Re: moving from contrib to bin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: moving from contrib to bin
Date
Msg-id 16970.1418435875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: moving from contrib to bin  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: moving from contrib to bin  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 12/12/14 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think pg_upgrade should continue to have SQL scripts that create and
>> delete the SQL function definitions for these.

> That won't actually work very easily.  LANGUAGE internal functions need
> to be in fmgr_builtins, and the only way to get them there is by listing
> them in pg_proc.h.  (We could drop the functions in initdb, but seems
> kind of silly.)

Oh, good point.

> The functions do already check themselves that they are called in binary
> upgrade mode, so exposing them in pg_proc doesn't seem risky.

Fair enough ... binary upgrade mode is not readily accessible, right?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: moving from contrib to bin
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: On partitioning