Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> it looks like I can probably rip that member out of TupOutputState
>>> altogether.
>>
>> Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking.
> Excellent. Revised patch attached.
Applied with minor editorialization.
It strikes me that it would now be quite easy to make the
efficiency improvement alluded to in do_tup_output's comment:
* XXX This could be made more efficient, since in reality we probably only* need a virtual tuple.
but I didn't have time to investigate that right now (got to leave for
a dentist appointment :-()
regards, tom lane
