Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date
Msg-id 16848.1628814549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Obviously the address may have to be adjusted if Apple moves stuff
> around, or if the initial layout and ASLR slide range turn out to be
> less constrained than I inferred by nosing around the source code and
> testing on a couple of systems.

Sure.  But we're no worse off than before; the workaround of "set
PG_SHMEM_ADDR by hand" is just as applicable as ever.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Isaac Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: Default to TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.