Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)
Date
Msg-id 16827.1276060496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> It's possible.  I don't really see a reason not to add an = operator
> for XML - does anyone else?

Yes, that was considered and rejected, IIRC.  What is your definition
of equality for xml?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5475: Problem during Instalation
Next
From: Sachin Srivastava
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5475: Problem during Instalation