Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes:
> I can't explain why I'm seeing a range type installcheck failure as I
> don't see the same problem on the buildfarm, but out of all the tests
> run, the range types test is the only one to fail.
I can duplicate that output ordering if I force it to use indexscans,
but it's quite unclear why it would do so by default for a six-row
table. Are you using weird planner cost parameters? (I'd have expected
such to result in a lot more diffs than this, though.)
regards, tom lane
