Re: Relational data model dead? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Relational data model dead?
Date
Msg-id 16781.1071529695@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Relational data model dead?  (Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>)
Responses Re: Relational data model dead?
Re: Relational data model dead?
List pgsql-general
Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar> writes:
> Has someone read this: http://www.wiscorp.com/sql/Sql99_p2.zip

I get a "not found"...

> Are this guys at Whitemarsh Information Systems Corporation important in the
> SQL99 writing?

Unlikely; if they are of the persuasion that relational DBs are
uninteresting, they'd hardly be spending time working on bigger and
better(?) standards for relational DBs.

"Relational databases are dead" has been a standard academic litany for
years now, but it has nothing to do with the real world AFAICS.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table.
Next
From: Martin Marques
Date:
Subject: Re: Relational data model dead?