Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> writes:
> Please consider fixing minor defects in the source code and documentation.
I agree with all of these, except the markup fixes in bgworker.sgml
still seem not right; it should be more like
<function>RegisterBackgroundWorker(<type>BackgroundWorker</type> *<parameter>worker</parameter>)</function>
> 6. "unhandled previous state in xqs" -> "unhandled previous state at end
> quote"?
> "xqs" is rather cryptic for a user-visible message
But it's not user-visible is it? That should surely be a can't-happen
case.
Will push in a little bit.
regards, tom lane
