Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Date
Msg-id 16342.1078781070@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]  (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>)
Responses Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
List pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> writes:
> Comments longer than ~7k would need a toast table. At the moment, toast
> tables don't work on a global basis.

Sure they do ... in fact, all the shared catalogs have one.

I think the idea of putting comments directly into pg_shadow and friends
is too icky to consider, though.  If we really wanted to support this
stuff then we'd make *one* shared table that is just like
pg_description, but is used for shared objects.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?)