Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Date
Msg-id 1078779366.57624.182.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:46, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> >Another problem is that pg_description is per-database, while
> >pg_user/group are global for all databases.
> >
> >  
> >
> databases are also per cluster, but we have comments on those.
> 
> Could we keep the user/group comments in those tables instead of in 
> pg_description?

Comments longer than ~7k would need a toast table. At the moment, toast
tables don't work on a global basis.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Next
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]