Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases
Date
Msg-id 16308.1165510580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes:
>> [root@conni ~]# ps axw|grep postgres
>> 1746 ?        S      0:00 postgres: writer process
>> 1747 ?        S      0:00 postgres: stats buffer process
>> 1748 ?        S      0:00 postgres: stats collector process
>> 2106 pts/1    S      0:00 su postgres
>> 2120 pts/1    S+     0:00 psql postgres
>> 2188 ?        S      0:04 postgres: postgres dummy1 [local] VACUUM waiting
>> 2200 pts/3    S      0:00 su postgres
>> 2215 ?        S      0:00 postgres: postgres dummy2 [local] idle in transaction
>> 2717 pts/2    R+     0:00 grep postgres

Too bad this wasn't accompanied by a dump of pg_locks ... but if that's
the only other open transaction, the only way I can see for it to block
the vacuum is if the vacuum was database-wide, and had gotten to the
point of trying to vacuum one of the shared catalogs (eg, pg_database),
and the other transaction had some type of lock on that shared catalog.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases
Next
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
Date:
Subject: Re: Internal function call from C-language function