Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date
Msg-id 162867791002232252j71314257w2af05d8f08613513@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2010/2/24 Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>:
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > 2010/2/23 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:
>> > >
>> > > Can someone work on a patch to implement the document changes suggested
>> > > below?
>> > >
>> >
>> > This patch is useless now. There are no this issue now, because we
>> > have integrated true SQL parser.
>>
>> Great, thanks.
>
> I believe a documentation issue still exists here. The section on
> calling functions (4.3) still says nothing about VARIADIC. Also, it's
> not 100% clear to me where function overloading should go, but perhaps
> it should be mentioned in that section as well.

please, can you write patch. For me it is mession impossible :)

Pavel

>
> Regards,
>        Jeff Davis
>
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter.
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Directory fsync and other fun