2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
>> > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't
>> >> have a parameter called "default_language"?
>> >
>> > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION
>> > is SQL. Should we implement that?
>> >
>>
>> isn't it SQL/PSM ?
>
> No, but if you implement the SQL/PSM part, then those statements become
> part of the "SQL" language.
>
ok.
i think so default_language could be potential risk for compatibility
with standard.
Pavel
>
