On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't
> >> have a parameter called "default_language"?
> >
> > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION
> > is SQL. Should we implement that?
> >
>
> isn't it SQL/PSM ?
No, but if you implement the SQL/PSM part, then those statements become
part of the "SQL" language.
