Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date
Msg-id 16235.1116383825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I don't understand why we are testing 64-bit CRC when I thought we
> agreed that 32-bit was good enough for our purposes.

Well, we need to understand exactly what is going on here.  I'd not
like to think that we dropped back from 64 to 32 bit because of one
possibly-minor optimization bug in one compiler on one platform.
Even if that compiler+platform is 90% of the market.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: patches for items from TODO list
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX