Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date
Msg-id 200505172229.j4HMTsL27844@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>)
Responses Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 12:35:35 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >Anyone want to try it with non-gcc compilers?
> 
> MS VC++ 6.0 with various predefined optimizer settings
> 
>                                 2x32        64
> Default (without any /O)     0.828125   0.906250
> MinSize (contains /O1)       0.468750   0.593750
> MaxSpeed (contains /O2)      0.312500   0.640625
> 
> Not that it really matters -- but at least this looks like another hint
> that letting the compiler emulate 64 bit operations on non 64 bit
> hardware is suboptimal.

I don't understand why we are testing 64-bit CRC when I thought we
agreed that 32-bit was good enough for our purposes.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)