Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Date
Msg-id 16172.1241819428@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Yes I apologize for that. Git reacted differently than I expected to a
> "git diff". I have since reposted a proper patch.

mmm ... I've recently been forced into using git for another project,
and I find myself mystified as to why anyone would want to use it.
Seems like baroqueness and unexpected behaviors are all over the thing.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Next
From: Seth Robertson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1