"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> I have some thoughts on this and other issues surrounding AM/PM, but
> perhaps they are better reserved for a separate thread. Might I
> suggest we apply Alex's bugfix and hold off on the message changes
> pending further discussion?
Agreed on separating the message issue. What I wanted to know was
whether there are similar bugs elsewhere in to_timestamp, or whether
you're pretty sure this is the only occurrence of the coding pattern?
I've always found it helpful to think "where else did we make this
same mistake" after identifying a bug.
regards, tom lane
