Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance
Date
Msg-id 15eac9b6-95ca-e407-0ee6-98f69895b798@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
I don't think inheritance and partitioning should behave the same in
terms of logical replication.

For me the current behavior with inherited tables is correct.

What I would like partitioned tables support to look like is that if we
add partitioned table, the data decoded from any of the partitions would
be sent as if the change was for that partitioned table so that the
partitioning scheme on subscriber does not need to be same as on
publisher. That's nontrivial to do though probably.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Letting the client choose the protocol to use during aSASL exchange