Re: 9.6beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 9.6beta3
Date
Msg-id 15623.1469808929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.6beta3  (rob stone <floriparob@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 9.6beta3
List pgsql-general
rob stone <floriparob@gmail.com> writes:
> So, could somebody tell me if the 9.6beta1 version of initdb contained
> an incorrect version constant?

It did, see

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=99dd8b05aa5647a59f30ca67e67e2e3377f50094

You would have had to do an initdb or pg_upgrade for the new version
anyway because of other catalog changes.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Using timestamp(tz) in C functions