Re: 9.6beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From rob stone
Subject Re: 9.6beta3
Date
Msg-id 1470007737.6480.3.camel@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 12:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> rob stone <floriparob@gmail.com> writes:
> > So, could somebody tell me if the 9.6beta1 version of initdb
> > contained
> > an incorrect version constant?
>
> It did, see
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=99
> dd8b05aa5647a59f30ca67e67e2e3377f50094
>
> You would have had to do an initdb or pg_upgrade for the new version
> anyway because of other catalog changes.
>
>             regards, tom lane


Thanks for that. Back to the drawing board. Only testing the beta
versions so no real harm done.

Cheers,
rob


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Patrick B
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_archivecleanup standalone bash script
Next
From: Charles Clavadetscher
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal "stack trace" like debugging option in PostgreSQL